![]()
Journal
most likely you've heard of the 'birther' movement.
most likely you've heard of the 'birther' movement. essentially the birthers are angry republicans who don't believe that president obama was born in the united states, and thus shouldn't be eligible to be president.
it's hard to talk about them and not use terms like 'delusional' and 'nutty', especially as: a-obama has a hawaiin birth certificate and b-every related agency in hawaii has certified that he was born in the united states.
people in the birther movement keep asking, 'why won't he provide his birth certificate?' which is odd, as his birth certificate was provided ages ago. here it is:

in addition to this there were also announcements of his birth in hawaiin newspapers, naming the parents and the hospital.
the birthers claim that this is all a fraud, that 48 years ago his family faked his american birth so that 48 years later he'd be elected president. um, i mean, how do you answer that? when there's documentation and fact proving people wrong, but when people still hold on to their beliefs, i mean, what do you do? like creationists. they believe the world is 10,000 years old, even though there's no evidence that the world is less than 4,000,000,000 years old. but when people cling to beliefs with no supporting facts, what do you do? how do you talk to someone whose beliefs are delusional?
it reminds me of an encounter i had in 2005. i was talking to a bush supporter from oklahoma about the war in iraq. i basically said, 'well, the war should never have been started, because iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 and there were no weapons of mass destruction found there.' to which this person said, 'oh, you're wrong, iraq started 9-11 and they definitely had weapons of mass destruction.' to which i said, 'every news outlet and even president bush has admitted that iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 and that they didn't have weapons of mass destruction. there's literally no evidence that iraq had anything to do with 9-11 or that they had weapons of mass destruction.' to which this person said, 'oh, you can't trust the facts. and they're not telling you everything.' i mean, again, what do you do? when someone has a belief (like that obama was born in kenya) that has absolutely no factual support, but yet they refuse to change their mind?
i understand that people want the world to be different from how it is (creationists want a world that is 10,000 years old, flat earth society members want a world that is the center of a small universe, 'birthers' want a world where obama isn't president, republicans want a world where saddam hussein had weapons of mass destruction, etc). but the world is at is, and it rarely conforms to our narrow and specific hopes for what it will be. holding on to an ethical belief (women should be allowed to vote, blacks and whites should be able to drink from the same water fountain, etc) in the face of unethical circumstances is noble, as the circumstances can be changed. but holding on to beliefs that are factually incorrect and can never be changed (as much as the birthers dont like obama, he did win the election and he is a united states citizen) is quixotic and delusional. it's kind of baffling.
moby
Archive
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008

